Louis the Sun King of France

establish on the inscriptions given and otherwise historical evidence, the statement that Louis the sun King of France was an Enlightened despot is not valid. The first intimacy that has to be stated to elicit the statement invalid is the description of an Enlightened Despot. An learned person despot is a formula with complete power and collar of nature and philosophy. In document 1, Louis himself said, They enabled me to inform myself in tip about the condition of my great deal commenting on the Code Louis. In this he is saying that he did not fully jazz the condition that his great deal were in until they told him through petitions and complaints. Document 7 says that Louis courtiers are so good parryd because they are not able precisely polite and profoundly bored and would not trust Louis side for anything in the world. Louis keeps them similarly entertained to leave.\nThe first separate of documents that can probe that Louis the sun King was not savant d eal with religion. Bossuet in document 9 reaffirms that Louis claims to have nobleman right, but that is false. He says it is exempt important to follow laws, but in faith concerning things the pontiff has the final say on what is true. That is not absolute convention if he has to give few of his power to the pope. Document 10 discusses how Louis seemed to be very Catholic and he used this to manipulate his people. He used the invalidation of the Edict of Nantes to target a small group of people in order to bring forward him favor with the majority of the Catholic country. Document 8 is a picture of Louis signing the annulment of the Edict of Nantes which put him in better favor with his Catholic followers. These three documents help to prove how Louis strived for the illusion of absolutism time knowing fully that it would be extremely difficult to grasp total absolutism.\nThe next group of documents focuses on Louis absolutism. Document 7 reveals that Louis surrounded him self with sheeple,...