Regular Assignment

One of his duties is to serve as the bus topology for runners who hope to complete the pertly York City Marathon. He himself has won several(prenominal) battle of Marathons and ultra- endurance contests runner tend. Thus he is more(prenominal) acquainted virtually the roles and responsibilities of coach for the battle of Marathon runners. After the introduction of David, case development drives us through understandings of how the complete dressing period of 16 weeks is carried out by athletes and runners. Initial 8 weeks he prime it easy to train the runners.He was pleased looking for the progress of the runners and had little difficulty in his role as coach. Some questions started to stick to in his mind regarding how to dish out his runners to touch their inclination. His issues of concern seemed quite incompatible from those that he had expected to hear from other runners he preceding(prenominal)ly trained for Marathons. Thus he divided runners and their concerns I nto sideline three different gatherings. The first convocation comprised of all staple fiber questions with newly joined runners who never had previous experiences.They kept on enquire introductory questions such as what to eat a day before marathon race, how more than to drink and what kind of shoes to wear. The minute of arc group comprised of runners who had previously ran for marathons but were matter toed about the effects of Davits raining on their outpouring, cute to whop the running milage link to their possible marathon close time. In addition their concern was to know whether consuming carbon-loading would improve their performances during the marathon.The third group comprised of seasoned runners who to the highest degreely finished marathon in top 10 of their various(prenominal) divisions. These group too had some concerns related to feeling flat and acted a position moody and down about training. The most important concern they carried was whether Davi ts coaching would help them in other races besides the raw(a) York City Marathon. Hint David should use the following leading strategy to train/coach his runners. The first group needs David to ferment sure that the runners will be cause if they feel competent.Runners kept on guideing questions such as what to eat a day before marathon race, how practically to drink and what kind of shoes to wear. I theorise He needs to spark off the runners, make a diet computer program and answer their questions they have. But he should too take a none that not to instruct all of the runners in a single group. Based on runners abilities he should have different training sessions. Because may be the beginners (group ) would keep asking basal questions like which shoes to wear, what to eat in a session which might not be interest to groups 3.For them it would lead to tediousness sessions of training and might remove interest from at caution further sessions and from Marathon race too. S o he should take product line of all runners and based on familiarity should keep training. He could have taken information session where all questions and issues be addressed. The second gear group was concerned about the effects of Davits training on their running mileage related to their possible marathon finish time and forts reward they would spawn in return after the marathon race.Running a marathon is a considerable deal and if people are nauseating or unsure they will ask a ton of questions. I think he should explain them the benefits they would get with the training. In addition he as a coach needs to be on that point for them and coach them to the finish line. He should pull down everyones stress when most seems nervous. Reassure the second group that they are doing great. The third group concern was not focused on current marathon race as objective by his training, but wanted to know if the payoff for their work valuable.David stick out motivate each of these g roups by tending to the groups needs. Answer the beginners group questions, make a diet plan. A final reproof that can be made of path- goal theory concerns a practical consequence of the theory. Path-goal theory suggests that it is important for leaders to go out coaching, guidance, and direction for subordinates, to help subordinates define and clear goals, and to help subordinates around obstacles as they fire to reach their goals. In effect, this approach treats leadership as a one centering event. The leader affects the subordinate.