The Criticisms of Kohlbergs Moral Development Stages Essay -- Moral D

The Criticisms of Kohlbergs Moral Development Stages set off nonpareilThe upbraidings of Kohlbergs moral t individuallying stages seem to center around third major points, his research methods, the regression of stage four, and fin tout ensembley his goals.The first criticism that I would like to address is that of his research methods. Kohlberg is often criticized for not hardly his subject selection, but also the methods by which he tries to extricate information from those subjects. His initial study consisted of school boys from a private institution in Chicago. The problem with this is fairly obvious, that this does not represent a signifi sightt set of the population to allow for generalized conclusions. In other words, how can we examine some boys from Chicago and ascertain that this is how all people develop world-wide?I believe that the answer to this criticism comes from the theory that it relates to. Kohlbergs moral development schema is highly dependent upon the idea that there ar profound truths that cannot be dismissed. These ideas are in the ether, wound into the very cloth that constructs human nature. Granted, his descriptions of the various stages also seem very dependent upon the environment and social institutions that an individual would be subjected to. Yet these institutions would be have to be built upon people, all of whom would share these ideological truths. It seems fairly obvious that all people have undeniable needs, survival and some group membership. Kohlbergs stages are merely methods by which one could fulfill these needs. For instance, Spartan societies were adamant astir(predicate) maintaining the purity and strength of the civilization. Citizens saw no wrong in exposing a sick or lame baby to the elements so that it might die. certainly an act of cruelty today, but in that federation, a necessary curse The prosperity and wealth of the whole was of greater importance than that of the individual.In addition t o these justifications, superfluous research substantiated Kohlbergs claims. Different subjects were tested, from all ages and regions, and the same conclusions were drawn from the data. Assuming that these conclusions are correct, and the data leads to the same interpretation, is there any other possibility? This arguing seems most impressive, especially considering the differences between people that are evident in everyday life. Similarities ... ...o a small compromise to fit their needs. In conclusion, it seems that there is definitely a way to combine the Kohlberg justice theme and the Gilligan caring theme of moral development. Mr. Kohlberg provides a method to police a society that does not include 100 percent utopian citizens. Ms. Gilligan gives us the big businessman to relate to each and every person, as a person. She indicates ways that we can identify with their perspectives, understand their needs, and compromise. Although the sincere world seems infinitely more interlacing than either of these models, they bear a frightening resemblance to real societies and real people. Maybe someday, a perfect model will be constructed, judged by a perfect path of moral development. Until then, I hope that I have found a good combination of these two ideas. One last side note I think I could make it weeks typing a paper on this subject. There are thousands of facets of each system that could fit into the others potential flaws. However, I think Ive been long-winded plenteous as it is. I have tried to make my points as compact and reasonable as possible, but without sacrificing exactly what I wanted to say. convey you for your patience.