Reconstructed Portrait of Juan Dela Cruz Essay

ReflectionThis kind of article is somewhat made to be funny upon criticism although some of his records argon true but accept adequate citation of example. The authors points are thoughts of a regular charlatan English 101 passer that wants to show off his talent in composition of proses like this one. Nevertheless, I will give my comments on the statement given by him.First, the authors use up of Filipinos uniqueness when it comes to humor didnt work. The statement hatful making fun of their own mistakes makes me think of humorous videos of other races laughing at their own mistake, the statement doesnt prove the uniqueness of the subject.And the part of the said article where intelligence of humor is talked about comes with a complicated context that it blends the positive and dis all in allow statement in one part of the text. He couldve written it in a flow which either of the two statements comes first. Second, the issue of the Filipinos speaking irrelevant languages fo r them (foreigners) to appreciate the hospitality of the natives it doesnt seem to make a sense. For all I know, its a part of tourism. This statement proves that we only disport the foreigners by speaking their language in our country and they do non speak our language in their country when we visit as tourer is baseless, the foreigners teach us their language and vice versa it serves as a souvenir, a token of knowledge. Maybe the author doesnt know that we moderate konichiwa, aloha, que tal? and they learn mabuhay, kumusta ka and mahal kita through this mean, it is hospitality Mr. author.Third, describing the creativity of Filipinos by mentioning when there is a colossal flood, they take it to their advantage to go up on the roofs of their houses to fish genus Tilapia for their dinner. this has nothing to do with creativity and inventiveness, climbing up the roof on a big flood is not creative, it is matter of life and death, they are not there to go fishing, they are trying to save their lives Mr. author.Fourth, the claim of us Filipinos being great violators is a mere blind legal opinion and an exposition of colonial mentality violating street signs, eating medically tabu food, buying pirated goods, walang ganyan sa states? I dont think so. American people do these things worse than we do.Fifth, cramming is compared to the story of Juan Tamad, I dont in truth think its related at all.