The domestic reforms of Alexander II Essay Example for Free

The domestic put rights of Alexander II EssayDuring Alexander IIs time on the throne he introduced many reforms that switch overd the face of Russia. Some historians repugn that the Tsar wanted to prevent more drastic change and protect the autarchy, for example the master(prenominal)(prenominal) reform that the Tsar is remembered for, is the emancipation of the surfs. This can be seen as the single greatest liberating measure in the bill of Europe and it also gave motivation to further reforms. However Alexander made a lecturing truism It is better to abolish serfdom from above then to wait for the time when it begins to abolish itself from below this speech starts to question why the Tsar was really instigating the reforms, it shows that he was very aware of the ol particularory propertying of unrest among the peasants, and as they made up 80% of the Russian population, the Tsar felt it would be wise to improve their feature and as a result this would strengthen Russia a s a whole. This can therefore be seen as an act of the Tsar to keep control of his country and his seat in power.For that reason I feel that this shows that the main intention of this reform was to prevent any ingrained changes. Another reason why I feel that the emancipation of surfs was intentional with the Tsars interest and fears of revolution at heart was when the serfs were freed, their landlords were given compensation for the deviation of their land from the state. However the peasants were then forced to the make redemption payments to the Obshchina (community/village) over 49 years. In fact the peasants ended up with around 1/5 slight land than before, due to the fact that they instantaneously had to pay for it. This showed that the Tsar did not create the reform solely for his people he created it to help his thriftiness and to prevent any radical change that may have been caused by an economic ruin.However about people argue that this was not his main intensio n in all reforms. For example they feel that the armed forces reforms were beneficial for the country, as it would help Russia defend itself. The Tsar divided the empire into different military districts separately able to make its mobilisation more efficient. I feel that this was not a defence against radical change but in response to the resounding defeat suffered by Russia in the Crimean War (1856), and to an sense of military advances implemented in other European countries.I also see the new discriminatory system that he created as a not have the prevention of change as its main intention, as I feel that it was very important for the surfs to be seek fairly which meant there was less corruption in the state. However some may see this reform as being unlawful of having an underlying feeling that the Tsar was creating it so that the people were happy as they were now being tried fairly, therefore trying to prevent drastic change.However I feel that it is unfair to completel y rouse emancipation as some see it not as a reform that focused the Tsars sole desire to prevent any drastic change but as a reform that was intentional to give freedom to a class that had before been denied any form of independence, to me this shows that not all reforms were designed by the Tsar to prevent drastic change.In conclusion I feel that Alexander IIs main intension in all of the reforms was to prevent more drastic change in Russia, as I feel that each of the reforms that he created have and underlying feeling that each was designed so that the autocracy benefited from it in some way, or so that there wouldnt be anything that could lead to any radical change like an revolution of some kind.