Drugs and Alcohol in American Popular Culture Essay

Drugs and Alcohol in American Popular ending - Essay ExampleAs for the authors credentials, Dr. Primack is a dexterity of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine in Pennsylvania. He is in any case a faculty of the Division of Adolescent Medicine and therefore he has an authority regarding adolescent air in the context of medical science, for adolescent behavior is the main subject of this particular study. Moreover, he is in like manner a recipient of the Physician Faculty Scholar Award from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The other author, Dr. Douglas is a nonher faculty member of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and Dr. Kraemer is a third faculty member of the same medical school. Dr. Douglas and Dr. Kraemer atomic number 18 affiliated with the Center for Research on Health Care of the same educational institution, and so it implies that they already have considerable background on how to conduct research on health care. The authors, being experts i n their fields, with their medical degrees, with Primacks expertise with adolescent medicine, and with Douglas and Kraemers experience with research on health care, hold up up a team of researchers that possess full credibility. The study is published by the National Institutes of Health, curiously PubMed Central and the U.S. National Library of Medicine. This is a reputable institution when it comes to research on health. This source is unless 3 years old and is certainly not that old for it to be considered unreliable or obsolete. The thesis advanced by the authors found on the results of the study is that there is an independent association in the midst of flick to cannabis in everyday music and early cannabis work among urban American adolescents. ... authors based on the results of the study is that there is an independent association between exposure to cannabis in popular music and early cannabis use among urban American adolescents (Primack et al.). The objectivity of the presentation and analysis of selective information lies in three facts. First, the sample size of 1198 American and African-American students is large enough to become interpretive program of the group of adolescents exposed to popular music with cannabis content. Secondly, the researchers used statistical analytical tools like multivariable regression, bivariate analysis, and additional analysis in the form of looking out whether there was a correlation between cannabis use and alcohol, but of which the researchers have not found any significant relationship. Thirdly, the study is impersonal and credible because the methods used in the study had been preapproved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board prior to the death penalty of the study (Primack et al.). If the procedure had not been approved by the board, it would not have been published by the NIH and it would not have been considered credible and objective. On the support to its claims, On the s ubject of comprehensiveness, the study was actually able to find the differences when it comes to various variables vis-a-vis the degree of correlation between exposure to popular music and cannabis use among the respondents Current use of cannabis was associated with higher(prenominal) exposure to cannabis in music, having a favorite creative person with a higher number of songs with cannabis references, older age, lower grades, less demanding parenting, less supportive parenting, higher sensation seeking, and higher rebelliousness while ever use of cannabis was associated with higher exposure to cannabis in