James Rachels The Challenge of Cultural Relativism Article

James Rachels The argufy of Cultural Relativism - Article ExampleThe cultural proscribedcomes can be argued using facts about a particular proposition culture, creating an argument that has an end result. But the argument itself is relative because it focuses on each culture has its own correct code which is not objective because opinions are formed based on experience and opinions are in themselves subjective and subject to different cultures.Rachels argues that cultural relativism has three unaccepted consequences. What are they? Rachels argues that cultural relativism has three unacceptable consequences and they are that we cant feel superior to a different culture, we can question the virtuous conduct of our culture upfront by asking whether one function is right, or wrong and indeed stick to that response and risked being looked down upon and finally, we begin to doubt whether progress is possible, necessary, and even important through with(predicate) venues such as soc ial reform.1. What does Kant mean by saying that a good will is the provided thing that is good without qualification? He means that a good will is the only thing that cant be measured by how much one does or does not do. Intelligence, talent, courage, and patience are all good things but are useless unless you have good character or will. If you have a positive desire to do and use your talents, they what you produce will be out of good, and not used incorrectly. We are all given power, and this power can be put to good use or bad use but it is still power. A goodwill allows the power to be put essentially to good use.When does an action have moral worth? An action has moral worth when it is done for the pursuit of duty and not for the sake of conforming to duty. This means that if we do something, we should do it for the sake of duty or right.not for the sake of sympathy.